KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO
KILO-B.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged) and YCST.NEO (Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KILO-B.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while YCST.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KILO-B.TO returned 34.09% vs -7.85% for YCST.NEO. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. KILO-B.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for YCST.NEO.
Performance
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KILO-B.TO achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than YCST.NEO's 12.72% return.
KILO-B.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 34.09%
- 3Y*
- 32.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.87%
- 10Y*
- —
YCST.NEO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- -7.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 4.14% | 41.94% |
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 12.72% | -16.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between KILO-B.TO and YCST.NEO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
KILO-B.TO
YCST.NEO
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KILO-B.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.95 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | -0.40 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | -0.81 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KILO-B.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | -0.38 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | -0.18 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, which is greater than YCST.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO-B.TO and YCST.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KILO-B.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -19.70% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.41% | -19.54% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.47% | -12.62% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -8.56% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.04% | 9.91% | -2.87% |
Volatility
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) is 5.43%, while Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that KILO-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCST.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KILO-B.TO | YCST.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 10.33% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.50% | 16.64% | +4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 20.54% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 25.22% | -8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 25.22% | -7.23% |
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KILO-B.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than YCST.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
KILO-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Dividend Comparison
KILO-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YCST.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% |
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 14.01% | 10.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KILO-B.TO and YCST.NEO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KILO-B.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KILO-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for YCST.NEO.
KILO-B.TO is categorized as Gold, while YCST.NEO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for KILO-B.TO and 0.40% for YCST.NEO.
Find the right allocation for KILO-B.TO and YCST.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer