PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KILO-B.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged) and YAVG.NEO (Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KILO-B.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while YAVG.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KILO-B.TO returned 34.38% vs 105.48% for YAVG.NEO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KILO-B.TO achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly lower than YAVG.NEO's 42.78% return.

KILO-B.TO

1D
0.66%
1M
0.22%
YTD
4.82%
6M
5.56%
1Y
34.38%
3Y*
32.83%
5Y*
22.03%
10Y*
—

YAVG.NEO

1D
-10.74%
1M
0.69%
YTD
42.78%
6M
30.18%
1Y
105.48%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged		4.82%41.94%
YAVG.NEO
Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF		42.78%57.91%

Correlation

The correlation between KILO-B.TO and YAVG.NEO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF

Often compared with KILO-B.TO:
KILO-B.TO vs. ZGLD.TOKILO-B.TO vs. CGL-C.TOKILO-B.TO vs. BTCY.TOKILO-B.TO vs. ZGLH.TOKILO-B.TO vs. VALT.TOKILO-B.TO vs. AGCC.TOKILO-B.TO vs. KILO.TO
Often compared with YAVG.NEO:
YAVG.NEO vs. CBNK.TOYAVG.NEO vs. AVGY.TOYAVG.NEO vs. NXF.TOYAVG.NEO vs. UMAX.TOYAVG.NEO vs. RCDC.TOYAVG.NEO vs. YNVD.NEOYAVG.NEO vs. SBT.TO

Return for Risk

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KILO-B.TO
KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO
YAVG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
YAVG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAVG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KILO-B.TOYAVG.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.38
2.16

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.81
2.93

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

4.10

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

12.10

-7.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the YAVG.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KILO-B.TO and YAVG.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KILO-B.TOYAVG.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.16

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.32

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.67

-0.46

Drawdowns

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum YAVG.NEO drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO-B.TO and YAVG.NEO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

KILO-B.TOYAVG.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-39.57%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.41%

-25.90%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.92%

-11.18%

-3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-8.27%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

8.75%

-1.65%

Volatility

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) is 5.37%, while Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) has a volatility of 16.20%. This indicates that KILO-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAVG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

KILO-B.TOYAVG.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

16.20%

-10.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.49%

39.35%

-17.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.05%

49.06%

-24.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

53.26%

-36.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

53.26%

-35.27%

Dividends

KILO-B.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

KILO-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YAVG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.38%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%
YAVG.NEO
Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF		24.38%8.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

KILO-B.TO and YAVG.NEO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KILO-B.TO is categorized as Gold, while YAVG.NEO is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KILO-B.TO and YAVG.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer