KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO).

KILO-B.TO and YAMZ.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KILO-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2018. YAMZ.NEO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Dec 19, 2022.

Performance

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	11.54%	56.51%	37.76%	10.43%	1.10%
YAMZ.NEO Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	-10.15%	9.09%	48.13%	96.20%	-1.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KILO-B.TO achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than YAMZ.NEO's -10.15% return.

KILO-B.TO

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -9.47%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 22.50%
• 1Y: 47.79%
• 3Y*: 35.04%
• 5Y*: 24.84%
• 10Y*: —

YAMZ.NEO

• 1D: 5.33%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: -10.15%
• 6M: -2.65%
• 1Y: 13.81%
• 3Y*: 31.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KILO-B.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than YAMZ.NEO's 1.72% expense ratio.

YAMZ.NEO

Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF

KILO-B.TO

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged

Return for Risk

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KILO-B.TO

KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

YAMZ.NEO

YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 23
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 23
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KILO-B.TO	YAMZ.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	0.37	+1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	0.77	+1.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.10	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	0.69	+2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	1.69	+7.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KILO-B.TO and YAMZ.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KILO-B.TO	YAMZ.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	0.37	+1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	1.08	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between KILO-B.TO and YAMZ.NEO is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

KILO-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YAMZ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.63%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%
YAMZ.NEO Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	16.63%	14.12%	8.07%	7.89%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum YAMZ.NEO drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO-B.TO and YAMZ.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KILO-B.TO	YAMZ.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-34.37%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.41%	-21.79%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.47%	-16.05%	+6.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-7.38%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.96%	8.92%	-3.96%

Volatility

KILO-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) is 10.32%, while Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that KILO-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAMZ.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KILO-B.TO	YAMZ.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.32%	11.57%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.01%	24.93%	-1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.03%	37.22%	-11.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	34.46%	-17.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	34.46%	-16.48%