KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KILO-B.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged) and SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - KILO-B.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while SOLL.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KILO-B.TO returned 34.38% vs -56.74% for SOLL.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KILO-B.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLL.TO.

Performance

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KILO-B.TO achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than SOLL.TO's -44.92% return.

KILO-B.TO

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 4.82%
• 6M: 5.56%
• 1Y: 34.38%
• 3Y*: 32.83%
• 5Y*: 22.03%
• 10Y*: —

SOLL.TO

• 1D: -4.36%
• 1M: -20.42%
• YTD: -44.92%
• 6M: -51.48%
• 1Y: -56.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	4.82%	27.87%
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units	-44.92%	-7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between KILO-B.TO and SOLL.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KILO-B.TO

KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 38
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

SOLL.TO

SOLL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SOLL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SOLL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) and Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KILO-B.TO	SOLL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	-0.78	+2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	-1.11	+2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.88	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	-0.78	+2.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.86	-1.25	+6.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the SOLL.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KILO-B.TO and SOLL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KILO-B.TO	SOLL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	-0.78	+2.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	-0.64	+1.84

Drawdowns

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KILO-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum SOLL.TO drawdown of -72.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO-B.TO and SOLL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	KILO-B.TO	SOLL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-72.76%	+50.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.41%	-72.76%	+55.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.92%	-72.76%	+57.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-34.73%	+27.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.10%	45.42%	-38.32%

Volatility

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) is 5.37%, while Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a volatility of 16.52%. This indicates that KILO-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KILO-B.TO	SOLL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	16.52%	-11.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.49%	49.07%	-27.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.05%	72.56%	-47.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	71.15%	-54.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.99%	71.15%	-53.16%

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KILO-B.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLL.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

KILO-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KILO-B.TO nor SOLL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KILO-B.TO and SOLL.TO in my portfolio?

KILO-B.TO and SOLL.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KILO-B.TO or SOLL.TO?

On fees, KILO-B.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KILO-B.TO or SOLL.TO?

KILO-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.

What is the main difference between KILO-B.TO and SOLL.TO?

KILO-B.TO is categorized as Gold, while SOLL.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for KILO-B.TO and 1.00% for SOLL.TO.