PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHYB vs. NEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KHYB vs. NEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHYB achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than NEMD's 3.76% return.


KHYB

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.41%
YTD
2.50%
6M
3.54%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*

NEMD

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.56%
YTD
3.76%
6M
4.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KHYB vs. NEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KHYB and NEMD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025

0.59

KHYB vs. NEMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KHYB
NEMD

Consumer Defensive

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

KHYB
100.0%
NEMD

-

Basic Materials

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Communication Services

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Consumer Cyclical

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Energy

KHYB

-

NEMD
100.0%

Financial Services

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Healthcare

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Industrials

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Real Estate

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Technology

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Utilities

KHYB

-

NEMD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KHYB vs. NEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHYB
KHYB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
KHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NEMD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHYB vs. NEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KHYBNEMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

KHYB vs. NEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KHYBNEMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

2.14

-1.86

Drawdowns

KHYB vs. NEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHYB drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than NEMD's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHYB and NEMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KHYBNEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-4.43%

-29.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.39%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-0.57%

-9.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

Volatility

KHYB vs. NEMD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KHYBNEMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

6.51%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

6.51%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

6.51%

-0.80%

KHYB vs. NEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KHYB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

KHYB vs. NEMD - Dividend Comparison

KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than NEMD's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
8.13%7.59%10.11%15.55%9.67%6.22%4.76%4.86%2.56%
NEMD
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF
4.73%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KHYB and NEMD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NEMD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NEMD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KHYB.

KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 4.73% for NEMD.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KHYB and 0.60% for NEMD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KHYB and NEMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer