KHYB vs. NEMD
KHYB (KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF) and NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. KHYB is passively managed, while NEMD is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KHYB charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NEMD.
Performance
KHYB vs. NEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KHYB achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than NEMD's 3.76% return.
KHYB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
NEMD
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KHYB vs. NEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 2.50% | 4.10% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 3.76% | 7.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between KHYB and NEMD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.59 |
KHYB vs. NEMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KHYB
NEMD
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
KHYB
NEMD
-
Basic Materials
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Communication Services
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Consumer Cyclical
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Energy
KHYB
-
NEMD
Financial Services
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Healthcare
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Industrials
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Real Estate
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Technology
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Utilities
KHYB
-
NEMD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KHYB vs. NEMD — Risk / Return Rank
KHYB
NEMD
KHYB vs. NEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KHYB | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KHYB | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 2.14 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
KHYB vs. NEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KHYB drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than NEMD's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHYB and NEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KHYB | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.63% | -4.43% | -29.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.39% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -0.57% | -9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
KHYB vs. NEMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KHYB | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 6.51% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 6.51% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 6.51% | -0.80% |
KHYB vs. NEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KHYB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
KHYB vs. NEMD - Dividend Comparison
KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than NEMD's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 8.13% | 7.59% | 10.11% | 15.55% | 9.67% | 6.22% | 4.76% | 4.86% | 2.56% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 4.73% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KHYB and NEMD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KHYB.
KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 4.73% for NEMD.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KHYB and 0.60% for NEMD.
Find the right allocation for KHYB and NEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer