PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHYB vs. LEMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KHYB vs. LEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KHYB vs. LEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
-0.41%9.59%10.79%3.50%-10.15%-12.32%2.00%8.87%0.45%
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
-1.40%18.02%-1.72%7.23%-10.74%-9.92%3.10%6.40%0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHYB achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly higher than LEMB's -1.40% return.


KHYB

1D
0.42%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
0.91%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*

LEMB

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
1.69%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
1.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KHYB vs. LEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KHYB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than LEMB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KHYB vs. LEMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHYB
KHYB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
KHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

LEMB
LEMB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHYB vs. LEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KHYBLEMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.79

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

2.40

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.02

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.76

8.47

-1.71

KHYB vs. LEMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KHYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the LEMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHYB and LEMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KHYBLEMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.79

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.11

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.03

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between KHYB and LEMB is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KHYB vs. LEMB - Dividend Comparison

KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than LEMB's 2.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
8.01%7.59%10.11%15.55%9.67%6.22%4.76%4.86%2.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
2.48%2.44%0.00%1.34%0.86%3.89%0.00%4.39%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.64%

Drawdowns

KHYB vs. LEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHYB drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than LEMB's maximum drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHYB and LEMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KHYBLEMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-30.82%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-6.00%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.01%

-25.29%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-7.30%

+3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-12.83%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.43%

-0.38%

Volatility

KHYB vs. LEMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) is 2.25%, while iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that KHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KHYBLEMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

3.20%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

4.72%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

6.86%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.30%

8.19%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

9.33%

-3.59%