PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHYB vs. INDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KHYB vs. INDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHYB achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -12.38% return.


KHYB

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.41%
YTD
2.50%
6M
3.54%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*

INDA

1D
-1.39%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
-12.38%
6M
-11.33%
1Y
-12.23%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KHYB vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
2.50%9.59%10.79%3.50%-10.15%-12.32%2.00%8.87%0.45%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-12.38%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between KHYB and INDA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.19

Over the past year, KHYB and INDA have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

KHYB vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KHYB
INDA

Consumer Defensive

100.0%
6.2%

Basic Materials

-

8.0%

Communication Services

-

4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.5%

Energy

-

9.5%

Financial Services

-

28.4%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Industrials

-

10.3%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Technology

-

8.3%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

KHYB
100.0%
INDA
6.2%

Basic Materials

KHYB

-

INDA
8.0%

Communication Services

KHYB

-

INDA
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KHYB

-

INDA
12.5%

Energy

KHYB

-

INDA
9.5%

Financial Services

KHYB

-

INDA
28.4%

Healthcare

KHYB

-

INDA
6.2%

Industrials

KHYB

-

INDA
10.3%

Real Estate

KHYB

-

INDA
1.4%

Technology

KHYB

-

INDA
8.3%

Utilities

KHYB

-

INDA
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KHYB vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHYB
KHYB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
KHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHYB vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KHYBINDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

0.87

+0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

-0.66

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

-1.59

+13.57

KHYB vs. INDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KHYB Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the INDA Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHYB and INDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KHYBINDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

-0.84

+3.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.15

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.23

+0.04

Drawdowns

KHYB vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHYB drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum INDA drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHYB and INDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KHYBINDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-45.07%

+11.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-18.69%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.94%

-22.72%

+16.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.86%

-22.72%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-19.42%

+18.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-9.57%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

7.71%

-6.83%

Volatility

KHYB vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) is 0.90%, while iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that KHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KHYBINDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

5.26%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

12.66%

-9.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

14.67%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

15.37%

-9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

21.12%

-15.41%

KHYB vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KHYB and INDA have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

KHYB vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison

KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
8.13%7.59%10.11%15.55%9.67%6.22%4.76%4.86%2.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KHYB and INDA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDA has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to KHYB (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KHYB dropped -33.63% vs INDA's -45.07%.

On 5-year performance, INDA leads with 2.32% vs 0.17% for KHYB. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, KHYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INDA has performed better with a 2.32% return vs 0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KHYB and INDA have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

KHYB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. KHYB tracks JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index., while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares.

KHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KHYB and INDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer