PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHYB vs. BSCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KHYB vs. BSCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KHYB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.46%
YTD
2.60%
6M
2.57%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

BSCP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KHYB vs. BSCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
2.60%9.59%10.79%3.50%-10.15%-12.32%2.00%8.87%0.45%
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.19%5.06%5.11%-5.99%-1.37%8.10%12.76%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between KHYB and BSCP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KHYB vs. BSCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHYB
KHYB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
KHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHYB vs. BSCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KHYBBSCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.50

KHYB vs. BSCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KHYB vs. BSCP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KHYBBSCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

Volatility

KHYB vs. BSCP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KHYBBSCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.70%

KHYB vs. BSCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KHYB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCP's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

KHYB vs. BSCP - Dividend Comparison

KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than BSCP's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
1.92%3.99%3.96%3.39%2.24%1.93%2.42%3.12%3.26%2.93%2.94%0.75%
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
8.13%7.59%10.11%15.55%9.67%6.22%4.76%4.86%2.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KHYB and BSCP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KHYB.

KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 1.92% for BSCP.

KHYB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while BSCP is Corporate Bonds. KHYB tracks JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index., while BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KHYB and 0.10% for BSCP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KHYB and BSCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer