KGLD vs. OMAH
KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KGLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
KGLD vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGLD achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 4.56% return.
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KGLD vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 2.99% | 29.75% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | 3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGLD and OMAH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGLD vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
KGLD
OMAH
KGLD vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGLD | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.70 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
KGLD vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGLD | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -11.83% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.40% | -2.65% | -16.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -1.26% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
KGLD vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGLD | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.72% | 8.05% | +20.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 13.21% | +15.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 13.21% | +15.51% |
KGLD vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KGLD vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.64%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 12.64% | 4.59% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGLD and OMAH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 12.64% for KGLD.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for KGLD and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer