KFRC vs. SCVL
KFRC (Kforce Inc.) and SCVL (Shoe Carnival, Inc.) are both stocks. KFRC operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials), while SCVL operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, KFRC returned 11.79%/yr vs 5.09%/yr for SCVL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KFRC vs. SCVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KFRC achieves a 52.32% return, which is significantly higher than SCVL's 2.84% return. Over the past 10 years, KFRC has outperformed SCVL with an annualized return of 11.79%, while SCVL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.09% annualized return.
KFRC
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 52.32%
- 6M
- 58.65%
- 1Y
- 18.12%
- 3Y*
- -5.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
SCVL
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- -9.60%
- 3Y*
- -4.33%
- 5Y*
- -10.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
KFRC vs. SCVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KFRC Kforce Inc. | 52.32% | -43.07% | -14.03% | 26.14% | -25.69% | 81.56% | 8.49% | 31.03% | 24.68% | 11.85% |
SCVL Shoe Carnival, Inc. | 2.84% | -47.64% | 11.18% | 28.52% | -38.00% | 101.21% | 6.51% | 12.39% | 26.61% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between KFRC and SCVL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 1995 | 0.26 |
The correlation between KFRC and SCVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KFRC:
$1.95
SCVL:
$1.80
KFRC:
23.76
SCVL:
9.44
KFRC:
0.62
SCVL:
0.58
KFRC:
$1.33B
SCVL:
$603.54M
KFRC:
$361.86M
SCVL:
$230.65M
KFRC:
$53.65M
SCVL:
$47.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KFRC vs. SCVL — Risk / Return Rank
KFRC
SCVL
KFRC vs. SCVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kforce Inc. (KFRC) and Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KFRC | SCVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | -0.19 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 0.06 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.01 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | -0.24 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | -0.40 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KFRC | SCVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | -0.19 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | -0.22 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.10 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.10 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
KFRC vs. SCVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KFRC drawdown since its inception was -94.60%, which is greater than SCVL's maximum drawdown of -84.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KFRC and SCVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KFRC | SCVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.60% | -84.87% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.03% | -39.72% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.72% | -65.17% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.41% | -65.17% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.41% | -68.53% | +2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.68% | -61.00% | +26.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -34.74% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.77% | 24.03% | +5.74% |
Volatility
KFRC vs. SCVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kforce Inc. (KFRC) is 12.00%, while Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) has a volatility of 14.43%. This indicates that KFRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KFRC | SCVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 14.43% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.26% | 31.84% | +15.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.12% | 49.85% | +18.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.55% | 47.73% | -6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.60% | 53.47% | -13.87% |
Dividends
KFRC vs. SCVL - Dividend Comparison
KFRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than SCVL's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KFRC Kforce Inc. | 3.38% | 5.05% | 2.68% | 2.13% | 2.19% | 1.30% | 1.90% | 1.81% | 1.94% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.78% |
SCVL Shoe Carnival, Inc. | 3.64% | 3.47% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.42% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.89% | 0.93% | 1.08% | 1.00% | 1.08% |
Financials
KFRC vs. SCVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kforce Inc. and Shoe Carnival, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KFRC vs. SCVL - Profitability Comparison
KFRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.07M and revenue of 330.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
SCVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported a gross profit of -88.73M and revenue of -254.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.
KFRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported an operating income of 12.01M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
SCVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.94M and revenue of -254.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
KFRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a net income of 7.93M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
SCVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shoe Carnival, Inc. reported a net income of -5.63M and revenue of -254.07M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KFRC and SCVL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCVL has higher volatility (14.43%) compared to KFRC (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KFRC dropped -94.60% vs SCVL's -84.87%.
KFRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KFRC and SCVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer