PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KFEB vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KFEB vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KFEB achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.52% return.


KFEB

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.92%
6M
9.02%
YTD
15.11%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.46%

GSG

1D
0.36%
1M
5.78%
6M
21.95%
YTD
32.52%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
8.03%
ALL TIME*
-2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.96M$16.42M$22.87M
$16.16K$46.03K$136.30K

KFEB vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KFEB and GSG is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025

-0.04

The correlation between KFEB and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KFEB vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KFEB
KFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
KFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
KFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
KFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KFEB vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KFEBGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

2.00

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.60

6.32

+9.28

KFEB vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KFEB and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KFEB vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KFEB drawdown since its inception was -14.16%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KFEB and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KFEBGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-89.62%

+75.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-18.81%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-59.99%

+59.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-63.67%

+61.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

5.94%

-4.39%

Volatility

KFEB vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) is 1.77%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that KFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KFEBGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

8.99%

-7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

21.89%

-14.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

24.44%

-13.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

22.90%

-10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.72%

22.08%

-9.36%

KFEB vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KFEB vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither KFEB nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KFEB and GSG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to KFEB (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KFEB dropped -14.16% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 37.47% vs 24.17% for KFEB. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 37.47% return vs 24.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KFEB.

KFEB and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

KFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KFEB and 0.75% for GSG.

KFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KFEB and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer