KF vs. PL
KF (The Korea Fund Inc) is Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Allianz Global Investors, while PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, KF returned 49.92%/yr vs 117.50%/yr for PL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KF vs. PL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KF achieves a 107.08% return, which is significantly higher than PL's 68.00% return.
KF
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 107.08%
- 6M
- 104.71%
- 1Y
- 182.72%
- 3Y*
- 49.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
PL
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -35.22%
- YTD
- 68.00%
- 6M
- 67.83%
- 1Y
- 443.11%
- 3Y*
- 117.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KF vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KF The Korea Fund Inc | 107.08% | 99.36% | -19.29% | 12.34% | -30.02% | 5.92% |
PL Planet Labs PBC | 68.00% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -45.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between KF and PL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KF vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank
KF
PL
KF vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Korea Fund Inc (KF) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KF | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.53 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.23 | 9.15 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.50 | 28.19 | -2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KF vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KF drawdown since its inception was -85.25%, roughly equal to the maximum PL drawdown of -85.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KF and PL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KF | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.25% | -85.11% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.42% | -48.83% | +23.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.04% | -55.17% | +27.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -35.54% | +29.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.83% | -55.27% | +17.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | 15.82% | -8.62% |
Volatility
KF vs. PL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Korea Fund Inc (KF) is 25.49%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 41.66%. This indicates that KF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KF | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.49% | 41.66% | -16.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.03% | 73.65% | -30.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.24% | 103.54% | -57.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 85.01% | -55.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 85.01% | -58.14% |
Dividends
KF vs. PL - Dividend Comparison
KF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while PL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KF The Korea Fund Inc | 0.58% | 1.20% | 2.46% | 0.00% | 15.93% | 26.50% | 1.30% | 0.24% | 18.67% | 9.75% | 1.03% | 13.66% |
PL Planet Labs PBC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KF and PL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (41.66%) compared to KF (25.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KF dropped -85.25% vs PL's -85.11%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 3.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KF and PL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer