KEUA vs. KTEC
KEUA (KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEUA is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P Carbon Credit EUA Index, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KEUA charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.
Performance
KEUA vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KEUA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KTEC
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -11.81%
- 6M
- -13.79%
- 1Y
- -10.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEUA vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | -19.02% | 32.81% | -14.52% | -3.14% | -2.74% | 22.01% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -11.81% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | -26.12% | -6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEUA and KTEC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEUA vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank
KEUA
KTEC
KEUA vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KEUA) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEUA | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.24 | — |
Drawdowns
KEUA vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEUA | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -66.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -44.35% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -43.97% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.34% | — |
Volatility
KEUA vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEUA | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 28.01% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 43.20% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 43.20% | — |
KEUA vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEUA has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEUA vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison
KEUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than KTEC's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEUA KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | 2.83% | 2.29% | 7.71% | 5.67% | 0.00% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.80% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEUA and KTEC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for KEUA.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 2.83% for KEUA.
KEUA is categorized as Commodities, while KTEC is China Equities. KEUA tracks S&P Carbon Credit EUA Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for KEUA and 0.69% for KTEC.
Find the right allocation for KEUA and KTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer