KEMX vs. VXUS
KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMX returned 13.33%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
KEMX vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 38.57% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 12.51% return.
KEMX
- 1D
- -5.69%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 38.57%
- 6M
- 40.16%
- 1Y
- 71.39%
- 3Y*
- 28.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
KEMX vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 38.57% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.51% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMX and VXUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between KEMX and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
KEMX vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KEMX
VXUS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
KEMX
VXUS
Financial Services
KEMX
VXUS
Industrials
KEMX
VXUS
Basic Materials
KEMX
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
KEMX
VXUS
Energy
KEMX
VXUS
Communication Services
KEMX
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
KEMX
VXUS
Utilities
KEMX
VXUS
Healthcare
KEMX
VXUS
Real Estate
KEMX
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMX vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
KEMX
VXUS
KEMX vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEMX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.34 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | 2.62 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.76 | 10.07 | +7.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEMX vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -35.97% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | -11.27% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | -13.58% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -29.44% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.69% | -3.04% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -8.20% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 2.93% | +1.10% |
Volatility
KEMX vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 13.52% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 7.07%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.52% | 7.07% | +6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.20% | 14.44% | +8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.26% | 16.36% | +8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 16.27% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 17.03% | +4.30% |
KEMX vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KEMX vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.37% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMX and VXUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to VXUS (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.33% vs 8.35% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.37% for KEMX.
KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.05% for VXUS.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEMX and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer