KEMX vs. IVOL
KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC. KEMX is passively managed, while IVOL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMX returned 14.09%/yr vs -5.72%/yr for IVOL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IVOL.
Performance
KEMX vs. IVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 44.15% return, which is significantly higher than IVOL's -6.01% return.
KEMX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 44.15%
- 6M
- 50.30%
- 1Y
- 82.49%
- 3Y*
- 30.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -6.75%
- 1Y
- -5.30%
- 3Y*
- -3.43%
- 5Y*
- -5.72%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX vs. IVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 44.15% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 14.81% |
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.01% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -0.31% | 14.56% | 3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMX and IVOL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019 | 0.05 |
KEMX vs. IVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KEMX
IVOL
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
KEMX
IVOL
-
Financial Services
KEMX
IVOL
Industrials
KEMX
IVOL
-
Basic Materials
KEMX
IVOL
-
Consumer Cyclical
KEMX
IVOL
-
Energy
KEMX
IVOL
-
Communication Services
KEMX
IVOL
-
Consumer Defensive
KEMX
IVOL
-
Utilities
KEMX
IVOL
-
Healthcare
KEMX
IVOL
-
Real Estate
KEMX
IVOL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMX vs. IVOL — Risk / Return Rank
KEMX
IVOL
KEMX vs. IVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEMX | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.71 | -0.77 | +4.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.43 | -1.08 | +5.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 0.88 | +0.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | -0.63 | +6.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.72 | -1.39 | +23.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEMX | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71 | -0.77 | +4.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | -0.45 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | -0.11 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
KEMX vs. IVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than IVOL's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and IVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMX | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -31.16% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | -9.50% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | -16.63% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -30.62% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.08% | +26.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -13.29% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 4.33% | -0.48% |
Volatility
KEMX vs. IVOL - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) at 1.10%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMX | IVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.67% | 1.10% | +8.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.84% | 4.44% | +15.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 6.93% | +15.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 12.84% | +5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 11.99% | +8.95% |
KEMX vs. IVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEMX vs. IVOL - Dividend Comparison
KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than IVOL's 3.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.88% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.28% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMX and IVOL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to IVOL (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs IVOL's -31.16%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 14.09% vs -5.72% for IVOL. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 14.09% return vs -5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 2.28% for KEMX.
KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IVOL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.99% for IVOL.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEMX and IVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer