PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KDRN vs. BOND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

KDRN vs. BOND

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KDRN (Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF) and BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KDRN returned 3.52%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for BOND. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KDRN charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BOND.

Performance

KDRN vs. BOND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDRN achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's 0.48% return.

KDRN

1D
0.04%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.24%
6M
0.92%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

BOND

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.46%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
2.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDRN vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KDRN
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF		1.24%4.65%1.30%10.06%-12.05%0.12%
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF		0.48%8.39%2.77%6.48%-14.57%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between KDRN and BOND is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2021

0.79

The correlation between KDRN and BOND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

KDRN vs. BOND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
KDRN
BOND

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KDRN
100.0%
BOND
100.0%

Basic Materials

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Communication Services

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Consumer Cyclical

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Consumer Defensive

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Energy

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Healthcare

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Industrials

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Real Estate

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Technology

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Utilities

KDRN

-

BOND

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF

PIMCO Active Bond ETF

Often compared with KDRN:
KDRN vs. NCPBKDRN vs. WABFKDRN vs. FTRBKDRN vs. BNDSKDRN vs. CPLSKDRN vs. OACPKDRN vs. QMNNX
Often compared with BOND:
BOND vs. TLTBOND vs. BNDBOND vs. SCHDBOND vs. VOOBOND vs. FBNDBOND vs. VTIBOND vs. SCHZ

Return for Risk

KDRN vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KDRN
KDRN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
KDRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
KDRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
BOND
BOND Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BOND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDRN vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KDRNBONDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

1.70

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

2.50

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.23

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.48

7.13

-3.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KDRN vs. BOND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the BOND Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDRN and BOND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KDRNBONDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.70

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.09

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.43

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.63

-0.50

Drawdowns

KDRN vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDRN drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, smaller than the maximum BOND drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDRN and BOND.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

KDRNBONDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

-19.71%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.77%

-3.01%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.94%

-6.12%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-19.71%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-19.71%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.57%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-3.50%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.94%

-0.05%

Volatility

KDRN vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) is 0.75%, while PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that KDRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

KDRNBONDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

1.40%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

2.88%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

3.97%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

5.76%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.61%

5.09%

+1.52%

KDRN vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDRN has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

KDRN vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison

KDRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than BOND's 5.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF		5.19%5.11%5.02%4.06%3.44%2.58%2.66%3.38%3.18%2.87%2.85%4.14%
KDRN
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF		3.11%2.54%2.83%2.84%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

KDRN and BOND have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOND has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to KDRN (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDRN dropped -15.29% vs BOND's -19.71%.

On 3-year performance, BOND leads with 4.99% vs 3.52% for KDRN. On fees, BOND is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, KDRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BOND has performed better with a 4.99% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOND is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for KDRN.

BOND has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 3.11% for KDRN.

They also come from different issuers: Kingsbarn and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for KDRN and 0.54% for BOND.

BOND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KDRN and BOND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer