KDEF vs. XAR
KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - KDEF tracks the The Korea Defence Industry Index while XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KDEF returned -1.81% vs 19.54% for XAR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
KDEF vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 7.46% return.
KDEF
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -26.57%
- 6M
- -32.11%
- YTD
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -1.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 29.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
KDEF vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | -12.28% | 116.28% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.46% | 38.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDEF and XAR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025 | 0.32 |
KDEF vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KDEF
XAR
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
KDEF
XAR
Consumer Cyclical
KDEF
XAR
-
Healthcare
KDEF
XAR
-
Technology
KDEF
XAR
Basic Materials
KDEF
-
XAR
-
Communication Services
KDEF
-
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
KDEF
-
XAR
-
Energy
KDEF
-
XAR
-
Financial Services
KDEF
-
XAR
-
Real Estate
KDEF
-
XAR
-
Utilities
KDEF
-
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDEF vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
KDEF
XAR
KDEF vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KDEF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.13 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.14 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 3.07 | -3.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KDEF vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -42.23%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDEF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.23% | -46.37% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.23% | -17.22% | -25.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.65% | -11.45% | -30.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -6.78% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.13% | 6.38% | +8.75% |
Volatility
KDEF vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 16.56% compared to SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at 7.12%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDEF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.56% | 7.12% | +9.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.99% | 22.70% | +17.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.14% | 28.36% | +19.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.43% | 23.79% | +24.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.43% | 24.77% | +23.66% |
KDEF vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDEF vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, more than XAR's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 7.83% | 5.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDEF and XAR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KDEF has higher volatility (16.56%) compared to XAR (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -42.23% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 19.54% vs -1.81% for KDEF. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 19.54% return vs -1.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.
KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.35% for XAR.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KDEF and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer