KDEF vs. WDGF
KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - KDEF tracks the The Korea Defence Industry Index while WDGF tracks the WisdomTree Global Defense Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDGF.
Performance
KDEF vs. WDGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than WDGF's 3.03% return.
KDEF
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -26.87%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 18.05%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDGF
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDEF vs. WDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.06% | -5.14% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 3.03% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDEF and WDGF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDEF vs. WDGF — Risk / Return Rank
KDEF
WDGF
KDEF vs. WDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KDEF | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KDEF | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.90 | 0.17 | +1.73 |
Drawdowns
KDEF vs. WDGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -29.45%, which is greater than WDGF's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and WDGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDEF | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.45% | -14.36% | -15.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.45% | -12.77% | -16.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -5.46% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.69% | — | — |
Volatility
KDEF vs. WDGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDEF | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.63% | 22.41% | +22.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 22.41% | +24.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 22.41% | +24.13% |
KDEF vs. WDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than WDGF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDEF vs. WDGF - Dividend Comparison
KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than WDGF's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF | 6.48% | 5.06% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDEF and WDGF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.
KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
KDEF tracks The Korea Defence Industry Index, while WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.45% for WDGF.
Find the right allocation for KDEF and WDGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer