PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KDEF vs. RISR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KDEF vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than RISR's 3.07% return.


KDEF

1D
1.61%
1M
-9.85%
YTD
10.00%
6M
13.24%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RISR

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.20%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEF vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KDEF and RISR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KDEF vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEF
KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RISR
RISR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEF vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KDEFRISRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

1.83

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

4.33

-1.85

KDEF vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEF and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KDEF vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than RISR's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and RISR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KDEFRISRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-14.31%

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.55%

-2.61%

-32.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.83%

-0.44%

-26.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-2.17%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.09%

1.10%

+9.99%

Volatility

KDEF vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 18.52% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.30%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KDEFRISRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.52%

1.30%

+17.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.55%

3.98%

+34.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.43%

5.45%

+40.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.55%

11.82%

+35.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.55%

11.82%

+35.73%

KDEF vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

KDEF vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than RISR's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KDEF
PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF
6.25%5.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.91%5.95%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


KDEF and RISR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KDEF has higher volatility (18.52%) compared to RISR (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -35.55% vs RISR's -14.31%.

On 1-year performance, KDEF leads with 23.84% vs 5.26% for RISR. On fees, KDEF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KDEF has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 5.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KDEF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 5.91% for RISR.

KDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while RISR is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 1.13% for RISR.

RISR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KDEF and RISR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer