KDEF vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the The Korea Defence Industry Index, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. KDEF is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past year, KDEF returned 23.84% vs 4.67% for MINT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KDEF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

KDEF vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEF achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 1.94% return.

KDEF

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -9.85%
• YTD: 10.00%
• 6M: 13.24%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.40%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEF vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	10.00%	116.28%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.94%	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between KDEF and MINT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

KDEF vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEF

KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 21
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 22
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEF vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KDEF	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	17.51	-16.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	66.94	-65.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	21.62	-20.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	95.35	-94.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.48	965.15	-962.67

KDEF vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEF and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KDEF vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEF and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KDEF	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.55%	-4.62%	-30.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.55%	-0.05%	-35.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.83%	0.00%	-26.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.96%	-0.17%	-6.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.09%	0.00%	+11.09%

Volatility

KDEF vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a higher volatility of 18.52% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that KDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KDEF	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.52%	0.09%	+18.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.55%	0.20%	+38.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.43%	0.27%	+46.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.55%	0.58%	+46.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.55%	0.95%	+46.60%

KDEF vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDEF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

KDEF vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	6.25%	5.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KDEF and MINT in my portfolio?

KDEF and MINT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KDEF or MINT?

KDEF has higher volatility (18.52%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEF dropped -35.55% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which ETF is better, KDEF or MINT?

On 1-year performance, KDEF leads with 23.84% vs 4.67% for MINT. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KDEF or MINT?

Over the 1-year period, KDEF has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KDEF or MINT?

MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KDEF or MINT?

KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.

What is the main difference between KDEF and MINT?

KDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: PLUS and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KDEF and 0.36% for MINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.51 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.