PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KDEC vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KDEC vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KDEC achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.


KDEC

1D
0.19%
1M
2.05%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.09%
1Y
19.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KDEC vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KDEC and BUFF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

0.74

The correlation between KDEC and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KDEC vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEC
KDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KDEC vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KDECBUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

2.80

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

4.24

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.58

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

4.02

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.87

21.50

-9.63

KDEC vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KDEC and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KDECBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.80

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.49

+0.13

Drawdowns

KDEC vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KDEC drawdown since its inception was -16.52%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDEC and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KDECBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.52%

-46.23%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-3.58%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-6.18%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

0.67%

+0.96%

Volatility

KDEC vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December (KDEC) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that KDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KDECBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

1.02%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

3.83%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

5.15%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

8.41%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.40%

17.67%

-5.27%

KDEC vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

KDEC vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither KDEC nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
KDEC
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KDEC and BUFF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KDEC has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KDEC dropped -16.52% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 1-year performance, KDEC leads with 19.43% vs 14.36% for BUFF. On fees, KDEC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KDEC has performed better with a 19.43% return vs 14.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KDEC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

KDEC and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KDEC and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KDEC and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer