PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCXIX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund (KCXIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCXIX achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 24.23% return.


KCXIX

1D
0.49%
1M
1.77%
6M
9.73%
YTD
11.93%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*

RESGX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.73%
6M
19.56%
YTD
24.23%
1Y
35.81%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KCXIX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund
11.93%17.20%25.06%29.05%-21.06%27.05%21.54%0.00%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
24.23%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between KCXIX and RESGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.91

The correlation between KCXIX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCXIX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCXIX
KCXIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KCXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
KCXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund (KCXIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KCXIXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

4.45

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

15.02

-5.21

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCXIX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCXIX drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, smaller than the maximum RESGX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCXIX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCXIXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.77%

-37.80%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-7.84%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-20.50%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-23.58%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-2.88%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-4.98%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.31%

-0.10%

Volatility

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund (KCXIX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) at 4.45%. This indicates that KCXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCXIXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.45%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

11.67%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

14.89%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

17.32%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

18.64%

+3.14%

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCXIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCXIX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

KCXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than RESGX's 6.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
KCXIX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund
2.52%2.81%2.61%1.85%1.41%1.48%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.86%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCXIX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KCXIX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to RESGX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCXIX dropped -35.77% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCXIX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer