PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCXIX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCXIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund (KCXIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCXIX achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return.


KCXIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.07%
YTD
11.11%
6M
9.83%
1Y
26.08%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCXIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KCXIX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund
11.11%17.20%25.06%29.05%-21.06%27.05%21.54%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between KCXIX and VOO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.98

The correlation between KCXIX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCXIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCXIX
KCXIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
KCXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KCXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCXIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund (KCXIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KCXIXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.67

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

11.96

+0.85

KCXIX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCXIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCXIX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KCXIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCXIX drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCXIX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCXIXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.77%

-33.99%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.90%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-18.69%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-24.52%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-3.14%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-3.68%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.99%

+0.15%

Volatility

KCXIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund (KCXIX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that KCXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCXIXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

4.83%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

9.82%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

12.46%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

16.91%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.84%

18.02%

+3.82%

KCXIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCXIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCXIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

KCXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCXIX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Index Fund
2.52%2.81%2.61%1.85%1.41%1.48%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, KCXIX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KCXIX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCXIX dropped -35.77% vs VOO's -33.99%.

KCXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCXIX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer