KCSH vs. SPTU
KCSH (KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - KCSH tracks the Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index while SPTU tracks the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCSH charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
KCSH vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KCSH having a 1.49% return and SPTU slightly lower at 1.48%.
KCSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCSH vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF | 1.49% | 0.92% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCSH and SPTU is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCSH vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
KCSH
SPTU
KCSH vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KCSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KCSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.26 | 11.82 | -8.56 |
Drawdowns
KCSH vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCSH drawdown since its inception was -0.58%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCSH and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -0.04% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.00% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | — | — |
Volatility
KCSH vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCSH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 0.32% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 0.32% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 0.32% | +1.01% |
KCSH vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCSH has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KCSH vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
KCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KCSH KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF | 3.97% | 4.35% | 2.08% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCSH and SPTU have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for KCSH.
KCSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
KCSH tracks Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index, while SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KCSH and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for KCSH and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer