KCEIX vs. HSGFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

KCEIX (Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund) and HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, KCEIX returned 10.57%/yr vs -1.73%/yr for HSGFX. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. KCEIX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for HSGFX.

Performance

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund (KCEIX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCEIX achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than HSGFX's -4.39% return.

KCEIX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 3.13%
• 6M: 10.85%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.32%

HSGFX

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 4.82%
• 6M: -2.51%
• YTD: -4.39%
• 1Y: -9.64%
• 3Y*: -2.40%
• 5Y*: -1.73%
• 10Y*: -2.10%
• ALL TIME*: 0.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
KCEIX Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KCEIX Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund	11.56%	5.51%	15.09%	2.84%	10.41%	16.74%	-11.05%	0.20%
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	-4.39%	6.24%	-6.99%	-11.60%	17.33%	-0.23%	14.52%	-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between KCEIX and HSGFX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019	-0.07

The correlation between KCEIX and HSGFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KCEIX vs. HSGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KCEIX

KCEIX Risk / Return Rank: 96
KCEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
KCEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KCEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KCEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KCEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

HSGFX

HSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 1
HSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund (KCEIX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KCEIX	HSGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	-0.62	+3.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	-0.85	+4.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	0.91	+0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.27	-0.47	+6.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.56	-0.85	+20.41

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the HSGFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCEIX and HSGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCEIX drawdown since its inception was -16.07%, smaller than the maximum HSGFX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCEIX and HSGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCEIX	HSGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.07%	-60.61%	+44.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-17.20%	+14.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.12%	-24.52%	+18.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.12%	-24.52%	+17.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-54.46%	+53.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-27.03%	+23.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	9.41%	-8.51%

Volatility

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund (KCEIX) is 2.84%, while Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that KCEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCEIX	HSGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	3.28%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.42%	10.36%	-4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.62%	12.86%	-6.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.90%	11.42%	-4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.09%	10.90%	-2.81%

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCEIX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HSGFX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

KCEIX vs. HSGFX - Dividend Comparison

KCEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than HSGFX's 2.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	2.43%	2.33%	3.00%	3.10%	1.08%	0.42%	0.16%	1.84%	1.19%	0.50%	0.28%	0.56%
KCEIX Knights of Columbus Long/Short Equity Fund	1.48%	1.66%	2.35%	2.20%	7.60%	0.00%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCEIX and HSGFX in my portfolio?

KCEIX and HSGFX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCEIX or HSGFX?

HSGFX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to KCEIX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCEIX dropped -16.07% vs HSGFX's -60.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KCEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.