PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCE vs. QABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCE vs. QABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than QABA's 8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KCE has outperformed QABA with an annualized return of 16.37%, while QABA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.


KCE

1D
-1.85%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
1.30%
1Y
10.93%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
16.37%

QABA

1D
-2.39%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
8.16%
6M
7.37%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
6.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCE vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
-1.07%10.76%37.51%32.04%-22.14%40.05%30.82%27.13%-15.63%32.01%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
8.16%4.62%14.49%-2.18%-9.01%34.20%-10.70%22.85%-16.47%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and QABA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.74

The correlation between KCE and QABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KCE vs. QABA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KCE
QABA

Financial Services

98.5%
99.7%

Technology

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KCE
98.5%
QABA
99.7%

Technology

KCE
1.5%
QABA

-

Basic Materials

KCE

-

QABA

-

Communication Services

KCE

-

QABA

-

Consumer Cyclical

KCE

-

QABA

-

Consumer Defensive

KCE

-

QABA

-

Energy

KCE

-

QABA

-

Healthcare

KCE

-

QABA

-

Industrials

KCE

-

QABA
0.3%

Real Estate

KCE

-

QABA

-

Utilities

KCE

-

QABA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCE vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCE
KCE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QABA
QABA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCE vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCEQABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.16

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.49

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

3.69

-2.04

KCE vs. QABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the QABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and QABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCEQABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.83

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.12

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.24

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.34

-0.09

Drawdowns

KCE vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than QABA's maximum drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and QABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCEQABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.00%

-49.30%

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-12.49%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-25.82%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

-42.93%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-49.30%

+8.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-4.25%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.81%

-11.43%

-11.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

5.02%

+1.61%

Volatility

KCE vs. QABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) is 4.24%, while First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that KCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCEQABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

5.63%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

15.22%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

22.50%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

26.50%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

28.69%

-5.59%

KCE vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QABA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCE vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than QABA's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
1.75%1.63%1.56%1.82%2.42%1.53%2.20%2.32%2.67%1.95%2.30%2.43%
QABA
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund
2.40%2.52%2.37%2.71%2.10%1.68%2.55%1.95%1.90%1.42%1.13%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCE and QABA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QABA has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to KCE (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs QABA's -49.30%.

On 10-year performance, KCE leads with 16.37% vs 6.80% for QABA. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KCE has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KCE has performed better with a 16.37% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.

QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.75% for KCE.

KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while QABA tracks NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.60% for QABA.

QABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCE and QABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer