KCE vs. IGM
KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KCE returned 17.65%/yr vs 24.57%/yr for IGM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KCE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
KCE vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, KCE has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 17.65%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.57% annualized return.
KCE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.65%
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
KCE vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 3.66% | 10.76% | 37.51% | 32.04% | -22.14% | 40.05% | 30.82% | 27.13% | -15.63% | 32.01% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCE and IGM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.70 |
The correlation between KCE and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KCE vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KCE
IGM
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KCE
IGM
Technology
KCE
IGM
Basic Materials
KCE
-
IGM
-
Communication Services
KCE
-
IGM
Consumer Cyclical
KCE
-
IGM
Consumer Defensive
KCE
-
IGM
-
Energy
KCE
-
IGM
Healthcare
KCE
-
IGM
-
Industrials
KCE
-
IGM
Real Estate
KCE
-
IGM
-
Utilities
KCE
-
IGM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCE vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
KCE
IGM
KCE vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCE | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.37 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.97 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 10.06 | -7.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCE vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCE | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.00% | -65.59% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -16.44% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.31% | -26.39% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.45% | -40.68% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.78% | -40.68% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -6.80% | +3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.78% | -15.22% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 4.84% | +1.86% |
Volatility
KCE vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) is 6.04%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that KCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCE | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 10.03% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 18.11% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 21.98% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 25.91% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 24.66% | -1.56% |
KCE vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCE vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than IGM's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.67% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCE and IGM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to KCE (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.57% vs 17.65% for KCE. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KCE has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.57% return vs 17.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.13% for IGM.
KCE is categorized as Financials Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.39% for IGM.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCE and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer