KCE vs. FCLD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) and FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while FCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KCE returned 24.58%/yr vs 24.61%/yr for FCLD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KCE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCLD.

Performance

KCE vs. FCLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than FCLD's 26.37% return.

KCE

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 3.66%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 14.27%
• 3Y*: 24.58%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 17.65%

FCLD

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: 9.94%
• YTD: 26.37%
• 6M: 24.95%
• 1Y: 35.98%
• 3Y*: 24.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCE vs. FCLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	3.66%	10.76%	37.51%	32.04%	-22.14%	6.51%
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF	26.37%	8.19%	21.80%	53.05%	-41.32%	-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and FCLD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between KCE and FCLD has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KCE vs. FCLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KCE	FCLD
Financial Services	98.5%	-
Technology	1.5%	86.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	7.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KCE vs. FCLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCE

KCE Risk / Return Rank: 22
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FCLD

FCLD Risk / Return Rank: 41
FCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCE vs. FCLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KCE	FCLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	1.29	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	1.83	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.22	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	2.07	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.14	5.28	-3.14

KCE vs. FCLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the FCLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and FCLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KCE vs. FCLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than FCLD's maximum drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and FCLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCE	FCLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.00%	-50.85%	-23.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.44%	-17.48%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.31%	-34.80%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.75%	-9.85%	+6.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.78%	-20.42%	-2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.70%	6.84%	-0.14%

Volatility

KCE vs. FCLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) is 6.04%, while Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that KCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCE	FCLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	11.75%	-5.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.31%	22.90%	-7.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.12%	28.06%	-7.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.08%	30.54%	-7.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.10%	30.54%	-7.44%

KCE vs. FCLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLD's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

KCE vs. FCLD - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than FCLD's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF	0.02%	0.03%	0.13%	0.17%	0.26%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	1.67%	1.63%	1.56%	1.82%	2.42%	1.53%	2.20%	2.32%	2.67%	1.95%	2.30%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCE and FCLD in my portfolio?

KCE and FCLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCE or FCLD?

FCLD has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to KCE (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs FCLD's -50.85%.

Which ETF is better, KCE or FCLD?

On 3-year performance, FCLD leads with 24.61% vs 24.58% for KCE. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KCE has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KCE or FCLD?

Over the 3-year period, FCLD has performed better with a 24.61% return vs 24.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCE or FCLD?

KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FCLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCE or FCLD?

KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.02% for FCLD.

What is the main difference between KCE and FCLD?

KCE is categorized as Financials Equities, while FCLD is Technology Equities. KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index, while FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KCE and 0.39% for FCLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.