PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWD vs. FLLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWD vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWD achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 13.04% return.


KBWD

1D
-2.44%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
-5.52%
6M
-6.05%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
4.82%

FLLV

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWD vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
-5.52%5.59%4.30%20.21%-19.14%31.89%-15.58%20.72%-8.70%12.06%
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWD and FLLV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.58

The correlation between KBWD and FLLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWD vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWD
FLLV

Financial Services

60.9%
13.0%

Real Estate

39.1%
2.5%

Basic Materials

-

2.7%

Communication Services

-

7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.1%

Energy

-

4.4%

Healthcare

-

11.6%

Industrials

-

9.6%

Technology

-

28.8%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

KBWD
60.9%
FLLV
13.0%

Real Estate

KBWD
39.1%
FLLV
2.5%

Basic Materials

KBWD

-

FLLV
2.7%

Communication Services

KBWD

-

FLLV
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWD

-

FLLV
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

KBWD

-

FLLV
6.1%

Energy

KBWD

-

FLLV
4.4%

Healthcare

KBWD

-

FLLV
11.6%

Industrials

KBWD

-

FLLV
9.6%

Technology

KBWD

-

FLLV
28.8%

Utilities

KBWD

-

FLLV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWD vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWD
KBWD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWD vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWDFLLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.61

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

5.52

-5.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

20.83

-20.38

KBWD vs. FLLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the FLLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWD and FLLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWDFLLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

3.26

-3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.84

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.84

-0.57

Drawdowns

KBWD vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWD drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than FLLV's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWD and FLLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWDFLLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-33.95%

-24.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-4.90%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.65%

-14.01%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-18.40%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.23%

-0.76%

-11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-3.25%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

1.30%

+4.50%

Volatility

KBWD vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) at 2.02%. This indicates that KBWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWDFLLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

2.02%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

5.96%

+6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

8.32%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

13.27%

+6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

15.69%

+7.55%

KBWD vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWD has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWD vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison

KBWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.40%, more than FLLV's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%0.00%
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
14.40%12.83%12.45%11.45%11.32%7.26%9.68%8.63%9.47%8.77%8.68%8.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWD and FLLV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWD has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to FLLV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWD dropped -58.63% vs FLLV's -33.95%.

On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 11.11% vs 0.13% for KBWD. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for KBWD.

KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.40%, compared with 4.73% for FLLV.

KBWD is categorized as Financials Equities, while FLLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for KBWD and 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWD and FLLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer