KBFR vs. BALT
KBFR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and BALT (Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. KBFR is actively managed, while BALT is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BALT.
Performance
KBFR vs. BALT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KBFR
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BALT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBFR vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KBFR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 3.16% |
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBFR and BALT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBFR vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank
KBFR
BALT
KBFR vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF (KBFR) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBFR | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.80 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
KBFR vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.18%, smaller than the maximum BALT drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBFR and BALT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBFR | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -4.89% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -0.06% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -0.34% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility
KBFR vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBFR | BALT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 2.19% | +8.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.95% | 3.31% | +7.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.95% | 3.31% | +7.64% |
KBFR vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBFR vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison
KBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF | 0.00% |
KBFR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBFR and BALT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KBFR.
KBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for BALT.
Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KBFR and 0.69% for BALT.
Find the right allocation for KBFR and BALT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer