KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK
KBC.BR (KBC Group NV) is a stock, while 3191.HK (Global X China Semiconductor ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the Factset China Semiconductor Index. Over the past 5 years, KBC.BR returned 19.68%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for 3191.HK. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
KBC.BR is traded in EUR, while 3191.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3191.HK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBC.BR achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than 3191.HK's 104.83% return.
KBC.BR
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 44.00%
- 3Y*
- 30.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
3191.HK
- 1D
- 6.25%
- 1M
- 20.93%
- YTD
- 104.83%
- 6M
- 105.84%
- 1Y
- 189.53%
- 3Y*
- 41.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBC.BR KBC Group NV | 9.97% | 54.82% | 35.54% | 2.45% | -12.80% | 35.65% | 12.84% |
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF | 104.83% | 24.13% | 19.09% | -9.35% | -35.59% | 27.52% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBC.BR and 3191.HK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK — Risk / Return Rank
KBC.BR
3191.HK
KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KBC Group NV (KBC.BR) and Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBC.BR | 3191.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.61 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 9.85 | -7.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 24.26 | -16.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBC.BR drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than 3191.HK's maximum drawdown of -60.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBC.BR and 3191.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBC.BR | 3191.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.82% | -60.32% | -34.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -20.01% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.27% | -40.62% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.52% | -60.32% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | 0.00% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -30.11% | -13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 8.03% | -2.65% |
Volatility
KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KBC Group NV (KBC.BR) is 6.38%, while Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) has a volatility of 18.60%. This indicates that KBC.BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3191.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBC.BR | 3191.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 18.60% | -12.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.66% | 32.30% | -14.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 41.56% | -19.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 40.38% | -13.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 39.96% | -10.12% |
Dividends
KBC.BR vs. 3191.HK - Dividend Comparison
KBC.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, while 3191.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBC.BR KBC Group NV | 4.33% | 2.88% | 6.10% | 4.77% | 8.82% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 3.65% | 4.23% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBC.BR and 3191.HK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KBC.BR and 3191.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer