3191.HK vs. 2807.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK).

3191.HK and 2807.HK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3191.HK is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Factset China Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Aug 6, 2020. 2807.HK is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. It was launched on Aug 6, 2020. Both 3191.HK and 2807.HK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
3191.HK Global X China Semiconductor ETF	-3.73%	41.08%	11.15%	-6.56%	-39.25%	19.31%	-1.68%
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	-7.55%	23.46%	5.68%	1.71%	-33.54%	11.35%	5.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3191.HK achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly higher than 2807.HK's -7.55% return.

3191.HK

• 1D: -3.10%
• 1M: -10.40%
• YTD: -3.73%
• 6M: -13.35%
• 1Y: 38.02%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 1.36%
• 10Y*: —

2807.HK

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: -11.26%
• YTD: -7.55%
• 6M: -18.02%
• 1Y: 11.07%
• 3Y*: -2.28%
• 5Y*: -2.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3191.HK and 2807.HK have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

3191.HK

Global X China Semiconductor ETF

2807.HK

Global X China Robotics and AI ETF

Return for Risk

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3191.HK

3191.HK Risk / Return Rank: 50
3191.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
3191.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
3191.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
3191.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
3191.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 19
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3191.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.32	+0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	0.64	+0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.09	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	0.39	+1.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	0.81	+3.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3191.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3191.HK and 2807.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3191.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	0.32	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	-0.08	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	-0.02	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between 3191.HK and 2807.HK is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3191.HK nor 2807.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3191.HK drawdown since its inception was -63.76%, which is greater than 2807.HK's maximum drawdown of -51.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3191.HK and 2807.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	3191.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.76%	-51.88%	-11.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.43%	-21.31%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.76%	-49.29%	-14.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.24%	-26.27%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-27.24%	-7.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.36%	10.44%	-2.08%

Volatility

3191.HK vs. 2807.HK - Volatility Comparison

Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) at 9.19%. This indicates that 3191.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2807.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3191.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.06%	9.19%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.98%	21.25%	+4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.31%	35.64%	+1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.20%	32.42%	+6.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.94%	32.76%	+6.18%