KAUG vs. FMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KAUG (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF) and FMAR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KAUG returned 15.76% vs 19.13% for FMAR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAR.

Performance

KAUG vs. FMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAUG achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than FMAR's 10.02% return.

KAUG

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: 15.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 11.01%
• 1Y: 19.13%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAUG vs. FMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KAUG Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF	7.07%	5.52%	2.80%
FMAR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	10.02%	9.69%	6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between KAUG and FMAR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.76

The correlation between KAUG and FMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KAUG vs. FMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAUG

KAUG Risk / Return Rank: 68
KAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
KAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
KAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
KAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
KAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FMAR

FMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAUG vs. FMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KAUG	FMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	3.79	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	6.08	-3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.94	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	8.14	-4.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.54	56.00	-41.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KAUG vs. FMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the FMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAUG and FMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KAUG	FMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	3.79	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.10	-0.34

Drawdowns

KAUG vs. FMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.66%, which is greater than FMAR's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAUG and FMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KAUG	FMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.66%	-14.36%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.94%	-2.36%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.21%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-2.14%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	0.34%	+0.75%

Volatility

KAUG vs. FMAR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) have volatilities of 0.98% and 0.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KAUG	FMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	0.98%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.15%	3.95%	+1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.02%	5.08%	+2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.21%	10.45%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.21%	10.35%	+0.86%

KAUG vs. FMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

KAUG vs. FMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KAUG nor FMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KAUG and FMAR in my portfolio?

KAUG and FMAR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KAUG or FMAR?

FMAR has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to KAUG (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KAUG dropped -15.66% vs FMAR's -14.36%.

Which ETF is better, KAUG or FMAR?

On 1-year performance, FMAR leads with 19.13% vs 15.76% for KAUG. On fees, KAUG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KAUG or FMAR?

Over the 1-year period, FMAR has performed better with a 19.13% return vs 15.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KAUG or FMAR?

KAUG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KAUG or FMAR?

KAUG and FMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KAUG and FMAR?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KAUG and 0.85% for FMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.