KAT vs. WLTG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KAT (Scharf ETF) and WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

KAT vs. WLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf ETF (KAT) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than WLTG's 5.49% return.

KAT

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -2.12%
• 6M: -2.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WLTG

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.17%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 22.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KAT vs. WLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KAT Scharf ETF	-2.12%	0.85%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	5.49%	9.42%

Correlation

The correlation between KAT and WLTG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

KAT vs. WLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WLTG

WLTG Risk / Return Rank: 55
WLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
WLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
WLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
WLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAT vs. WLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KAT	WLTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.34	—

Drawdowns

KAT vs. WLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum WLTG drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and WLTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KAT	WLTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-25.14%	+15.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.33%	-2.68%	-4.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-8.98%	+5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KAT	WLTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.58%	14.07%	-3.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.58%	15.21%	-4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.58%	15.21%	-4.63%

KAT vs. WLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KAT and WLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

KAT vs. WLTG - Dividend Comparison

KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KAT Scharf ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF	4.20%	4.43%	0.55%	0.71%	0.44%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KAT and WLTG in my portfolio?

KAT and WLTG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KAT or WLTG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KAT or WLTG?

KAT and WLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KAT or WLTG?

WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.

What is the main difference between KAT and WLTG?

They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and WealthTrust.