KAT vs. WLTG
KAT (Scharf ETF) and WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
KAT vs. WLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than WLTG's 7.58% return.
KAT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLTG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAT vs. WLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.37% | 0.98% |
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | 7.58% | 9.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAT and WLTG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAT vs. WLTG — Risk / Return Rank
KAT
WLTG
KAT vs. WLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KAT | WLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.69 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
KAT vs. WLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum WLTG drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and WLTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAT | WLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -25.14% | +15.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.98% | -0.75% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -9.08% | +5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.12% | — |
Volatility
KAT vs. WLTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAT | WLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 13.31% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 15.14% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 15.14% | -4.66% |
KAT vs. WLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KAT and WLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
KAT vs. WLTG - Dividend Comparison
KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | 4.12% | 4.43% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.44% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KAT and WLTG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KAT and WLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.
They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and WealthTrust.
Find the right allocation for KAT and WLTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer