KARP.L vs. LOCK.L
KARP.L (KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD) and LOCK.L (iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Waystone Management and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KARP.L returned 2.82%/yr vs 19.43%/yr for LOCK.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KARP.L charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LOCK.L.
Performance
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
KARP.L is traded in GBP, while LOCK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LOCK.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KARP.L achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly lower than LOCK.L's 22.33% return.
KARP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 68.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOCK.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- 22.33%
- 6M
- 23.40%
- 1Y
- 29.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARP.L KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD | 15.05% | 33.35% | -17.39% | -12.26% | -21.62% |
LOCK.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc | 22.33% | 3.43% | 18.88% | 27.28% | -7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between KARP.L and LOCK.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2022 | 0.44 |
The correlation between KARP.L and LOCK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L — Risk / Return Rank
KARP.L
LOCK.L
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KARP.L | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.27 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.27 | 2.35 | +4.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.63 | 5.40 | +15.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KARP.L | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 1.45 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.60 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KARP.L drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, which is greater than LOCK.L's maximum drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARP.L and LOCK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KARP.L | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.63% | -27.28% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -12.55% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.94% | -24.36% | -22.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.90% | -0.67% | -19.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -8.06% | -26.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 5.49% | -2.05% |
Volatility
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L) is 0.00%, while iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Acc (LOCK.L) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that KARP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOCK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KARP.L | LOCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 8.09% | -8.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 16.38% | -3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.92% | 20.36% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 20.05% | +4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 20.30% | +4.33% |
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KARP.L has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than LOCK.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
KARP.L vs. LOCK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KARP.L nor LOCK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KARP.L and LOCK.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOCK.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOCK.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARP.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Waystone Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARP.L and 0.40% for LOCK.L.
Find the right allocation for KARP.L and LOCK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer