PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAPR vs. BMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KAPR vs. BMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KAPR vs. BMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KAPR
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April
3.19%7.42%12.10%15.36%-8.14%2.48%21.17%
BMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
-1.06%14.97%16.49%23.09%-7.06%16.79%30.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAPR achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than BMAR's -1.06% return.


KAPR

1D
0.62%
1M
1.14%
YTD
3.19%
6M
5.99%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

BMAR

1D
2.26%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
1.73%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KAPR vs. BMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KAPR and BMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

KAPR vs. BMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BMAR
BMAR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAPR vs. BMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KAPRBMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.18

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

1.78

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.66

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.86

9.38

+3.48

KAPR vs. BMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAPR and BMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KAPRBMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.18

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.96

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.85

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between KAPR and BMAR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

KAPR vs. BMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KAPR nor BMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KAPR vs. BMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum BMAR drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAPR and BMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KAPRBMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-21.43%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-9.47%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-15.02%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.51%

+3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-2.40%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.67%

-0.30%

Volatility

KAPR vs. BMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) is 1.70%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that KAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KAPRBMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

4.15%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

5.88%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

12.98%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.77%

11.32%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.72%

13.81%

-2.09%