PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KAPR vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KAPR vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KAPR vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KAPR
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April
3.19%7.42%12.10%15.36%-8.14%-0.54%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.13%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KAPR achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's -0.13% return.


KAPR

1D
0.62%
1M
1.14%
YTD
3.19%
6M
5.99%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

BALT

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.97%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KAPR vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KAPR vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KAPR vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KAPRBALTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.49

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

2.29

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.91

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.86

12.79

+0.07

KAPR vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KAPR and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KAPRBALTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.49

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.70

-0.97

Correlation

The correlation between KAPR and BALT is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KAPR vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither KAPR nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KAPR vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAPR and BALT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KAPRBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-4.89%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-3.48%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.05%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-0.35%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

0.52%

+0.85%

Volatility

KAPR vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.61%. This indicates that KAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KAPRBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

0.61%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

1.84%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

4.48%

+5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.77%

3.36%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.72%

3.36%

+8.36%