KAPR vs. APRB
KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. KAPR is passively managed, while APRB is actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
KAPR vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAPR achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than APRB's 5.78% return.
KAPR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.28%
APRB
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.58K | $46.66K | $43.31K | |
| $147.78K | $281.73K | $305.41K |
KAPR vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April | 13.09% | 2.42% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 5.78% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAPR and APRB is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAPR vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
KAPR
APRB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KAPR vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KAPR | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KAPR vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAPR drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAPR and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAPR | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -4.59% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -0.65% | -3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
KAPR vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAPR | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.53% | 5.72% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 5.72% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 5.72% | +5.84% |
KAPR vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAPR vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither KAPR nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KAPR and APRB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.
KAPR and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KAPR and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for KAPR and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer