JXN vs. SEZL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JXN (Jackson Financial Inc.) and SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — JXN in Asset Management, SEZL in Credit Services. Over the past year, JXN returned 27.97% vs -0.76% for SEZL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JXN vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jackson Financial Inc. (JXN) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JXN achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 78.32% return.

JXN

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: -7.97%
• YTD: -1.28%
• 6M: 6.17%
• 1Y: 27.97%
• 3Y*: 57.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEZL

• 1D: -4.42%
• 1M: 31.68%
• YTD: 78.32%
• 6M: 75.65%
• 1Y: -0.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JXN vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JXN Jackson Financial Inc.	-1.28%	26.93%	76.45%	57.25%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	78.32%	48.89%	1,146.59%	-74.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JXN and SEZL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023	0.30

Fundamentals

EPS JXN : -$7.23 SEZL : $4.15
PS Ratio JXN : 0.95 SEZL : 8.42
Total Revenue (TTM) JXN : $5.86B SEZL : $480.91M
Gross Profit (TTM) JXN : $5.39B SEZL : $426.79M
EBITDA (TTM) JXN : -$22.00M SEZL : $193.18M

Return for Risk

JXN vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JXN

JXN Risk / Return Rank: 66
JXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
JXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
JXN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
JXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
JXN Martin Ratio Rank: 71

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 42
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JXN vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jackson Financial Inc. (JXN) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JXN	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	-0.01	+0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	0.64	+0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.08	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	-0.01	+1.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	-0.01	+4.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JXN vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JXN Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JXN and SEZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JXN	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	-0.01	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.85	-0.05

Drawdowns

JXN vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JXN drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, smaller than the maximum SEZL drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JXN and SEZL.

Drawdown Indicators

	JXN	SEZL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-89.95%	+41.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.31%	-72.02%	+55.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.85%	-37.86%	+24.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.11%	-40.43%	+25.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.98%	53.34%	-46.36%

Volatility

JXN vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jackson Financial Inc. (JXN) is 11.64%, while Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a volatility of 21.11%. This indicates that JXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JXN	SEZL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.64%	21.11%	-9.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.33%	61.86%	-38.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.89%	87.75%	-55.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.06%	135.88%	-91.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.06%	135.88%	-91.82%

Dividends

JXN vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

JXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, while SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JXN Jackson Financial Inc.	3.16%	3.00%	3.22%	4.84%	6.32%	1.20%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

JXN vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jackson Financial Inc. and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

JXN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jackson Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

JXN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jackson Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

JXN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jackson Financial Inc. reported a net income of -435.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of -15.0%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JXN and SEZL in my portfolio?

JXN and SEZL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JXN or SEZL?

SEZL has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to JXN (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JXN dropped -48.34% vs SEZL's -89.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.