PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Jamieson Wellness Inc. (JWEL.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO).

Performance

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Jamieson Wellness Inc. (JWEL.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JWEL.TO
Jamieson Wellness Inc.		2.88%-5.89%18.75%-7.34%-10.92%12.79%42.35%22.84%-3.09%469,077.94%
ATD.TO
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.		5.48%-4.91%3.11%32.26%13.21%22.84%5.88%22.54%3.57%10.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JWEL.TO:

CA$1.48B

ATD.TO:

CA$72.90B

EPS

JWEL.TO:

CA$1.45

ATD.TO:

CA$2.89

PE Ratio

JWEL.TO:

23.71

ATD.TO:

27.32

PEG Ratio

JWEL.TO:

5.76

ATD.TO:

8.46

PS Ratio

JWEL.TO:

1.80

ATD.TO:

1.01

PB Ratio

JWEL.TO:

3.04

ATD.TO:

4.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

JWEL.TO:

CA$822.06M

ATD.TO:

CA$73.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JWEL.TO:

CA$338.33M

ATD.TO:

CA$13.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

JWEL.TO:

CA$130.30M

ATD.TO:

CA$6.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JWEL.TO achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than ATD.TO's 5.48% return.

JWEL.TO

1D
2.17%
1M
-8.20%
YTD
2.88%
6M
-3.76%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
—

ATD.TO

1D
1.78%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
5.48%
6M
6.79%
1Y
12.34%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Jamieson Wellness Inc.

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.

Often compared with JWEL.TO:
JWEL.TO vs. MDA.TOJWEL.TO vs. ^GSPCJWEL.TO vs. AAPLJWEL.TO vs. BALIJWEL.TO vs. FBTCJWEL.TO vs. CVEJWEL.TO vs. EIF.TO
Often compared with ATD.TO:
ATD.TO vs. DOL.TOATD.TO vs. CNR.TOATD.TO vs. MRU.TOATD.TO vs. TOU.TOATD.TO vs. CTRAATD.TO vs. CTC.TOATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO

Return for Risk

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
JWEL.TO
JWEL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JWEL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JWEL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JWEL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
JWEL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JWEL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
ATD.TO
ATD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ATD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jamieson Wellness Inc. (JWEL.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

JWEL.TOATD.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.48

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

0.94

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.11

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.34

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.36

2.68

-0.32

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JWEL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the ATD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JWEL.TO and ATD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

JWEL.TOATD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.48

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.64

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.46

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

-0.00

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between JWEL.TO and ATD.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison

JWEL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than ATD.TO's 1.04% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JWEL.TO
Jamieson Wellness Inc.		2.62%2.62%2.18%2.27%1.82%1.37%1.30%1.48%1.59%0.72%0.00%0.00%
ATD.TO
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.		1.04%1.07%0.90%0.76%0.79%0.71%0.69%0.61%0.57%0.55%0.50%0.27%

Drawdowns

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JWEL.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.81%, smaller than the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JWEL.TO and ATD.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

JWEL.TOATD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.81%

-100.00%

+54.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-10.66%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.47%

-22.16%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-32.61%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.35%

-99.89%

+88.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-79.30%

+64.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.58%

5.32%

+1.26%

Volatility

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jamieson Wellness Inc. (JWEL.TO) is 5.85%, while Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that JWEL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

JWEL.TOATD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

9.42%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

18.28%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

25.97%

-3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

23.43%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123,644.75%

24.49%

+123,620.26%

Financials

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jamieson Wellness Inc. and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
277.66M
21.81B
(JWEL.TO) Total Revenue
(ATD.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

JWEL.TO vs. ATD.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jamieson Wellness Inc. and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
42.7%
19.4%
Portfolio components
JWEL.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jamieson Wellness Inc. reported a gross profit of 118.68M and revenue of 277.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

ATD.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 21.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

JWEL.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jamieson Wellness Inc. reported an operating income of 57.67M and revenue of 277.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

ATD.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

JWEL.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jamieson Wellness Inc. reported a net income of 36.83M and revenue of 277.66M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

ATD.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 757.20M and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.