JVAL vs. JPST
JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JVAL is passively managed, while JPST is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JVAL returned 12.29%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for JPST. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JVAL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPST.
Performance
JVAL vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.40% return.
JVAL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
JVAL vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.44% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.40% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.14% | 0.11% | 2.18% | 3.34% | 2.23% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between JVAL and JPST is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.07 |
The correlation between JVAL and JPST shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JVAL vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JVAL
JPST
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
JVAL
JPST
Consumer Cyclical
JVAL
JPST
Financial Services
JVAL
JPST
Healthcare
JVAL
JPST
Industrials
JVAL
JPST
Communication Services
JVAL
JPST
Energy
JVAL
JPST
Consumer Defensive
JVAL
JPST
Real Estate
JVAL
JPST
Basic Materials
JVAL
JPST
Utilities
JVAL
JPST
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JVAL vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
JVAL
JPST
JVAL vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JVAL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 3.94 | -2.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 29.16 | -24.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.70 | 144.13 | -125.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JVAL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 8.09 | -5.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 6.32 | -5.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 3.20 | -2.54 |
Drawdowns
JVAL vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and JPST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVAL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -3.28% | -37.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -0.15% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -0.30% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -0.79% | -21.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.02% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -0.08% | -5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 0.03% | +2.11% |
Volatility
JVAL vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that JVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JVAL | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 0.15% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 0.36% | +9.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 0.54% | +13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 0.58% | +16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 0.93% | +18.89% |
JVAL vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JVAL vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than JPST's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.26% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.72% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JVAL and JPST have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JVAL has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs JPST's -3.28%.
On 5-year performance, JVAL leads with 12.29% vs 3.61% for JPST. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JVAL has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPST.
JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.72% for JVAL.
JVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.18% for JPST.
JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JVAL and JPST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer