JVAL vs. IVV
JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JVAL returned 12.53%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JVAL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
JVAL vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.89% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.75% return.
JVAL
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 19.89%
- 1Y
- 34.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.96%
IVV
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.33B | $3.25B | $5.92B | |
| $2.04M | $2.35M | $3.17M |
JVAL vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.89% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 11.75% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between JVAL and IVV is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JVAL and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
JVAL vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JVAL
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
JVAL
IVV
Financial Services
JVAL
IVV
Healthcare
JVAL
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
JVAL
IVV
Communication Services
JVAL
IVV
Industrials
JVAL
IVV
Energy
JVAL
IVV
Consumer Defensive
JVAL
IVV
Utilities
JVAL
IVV
Basic Materials
JVAL
IVV
Real Estate
JVAL
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JVAL vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
JVAL
IVV
JVAL vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JVAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 2.64 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.01 | 11.23 | +4.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JVAL vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -55.25% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -8.89% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -18.75% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -24.53% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -10.72% | +5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 2.08% | +0.10% |
Volatility
JVAL vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) is 3.32%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that JVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JVAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.81% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 10.27% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 12.87% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 17.03% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 18.07% | +1.69% |
JVAL vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JVAL vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JVAL and IVV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to JVAL (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.13% vs 12.53% for JVAL. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JVAL.
JVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.
JVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.03% for IVV.
JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JVAL and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer