JVAL vs. BGIG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. JVAL is passively managed, while BGIG is actively managed. Over the past year, JVAL returned 34.83% vs 22.35% for BGIG. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JVAL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

JVAL vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.89% return, which is significantly higher than BGIG's 14.46% return.

JVAL

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 14.82%
• YTD: 19.89%
• 1Y: 34.83%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.96%

BGIG

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 10.55%
• YTD: 14.46%
• 1Y: 22.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	$3.32M	$3.63M	$4.29M
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF	$2.04M	$2.35M	$3.17M

JVAL vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF	19.89%	16.16%	14.53%	8.46%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	14.46%	12.49%	16.84%	3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JVAL and BGIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.78

The correlation between JVAL and BGIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JVAL vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JVAL	BGIG
Technology	39.9%	24.2%
Financial Services	10.8%	14.5%
Healthcare	10.0%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	4.9%
Communication Services	8.4%	1.2%
Industrials	7.8%	10.7%
Energy	3.6%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	6.1%
Utilities	2.5%	7.3%
Basic Materials	2.2%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	3.7%

Return for Risk

JVAL vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JVAL

JVAL Risk / Return Rank: 91
JVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
JVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
JVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
JVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 91
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JVAL vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JVAL	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.53	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.61	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.46	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	3.87	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.01	15.13	+0.88

JVAL vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JVAL and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JVAL vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JVAL	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.42%	-13.24%	-27.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-5.81%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	0.00%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.23%	-1.69%	-3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	1.48%	+0.70%

Volatility

JVAL vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) at 2.00%. This indicates that JVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JVAL	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	2.00%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.14%	6.74%	+4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.58%	8.91%	+5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	11.74%	+5.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	11.74%	+8.02%

JVAL vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

JVAL vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than BGIG's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.68%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF	1.63%	2.08%	2.21%	2.43%	2.46%	1.88%	2.55%	2.58%	2.61%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JVAL and BGIG in my portfolio?

JVAL and BGIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JVAL or BGIG?

JVAL has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to BGIG (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

Which ETF is better, JVAL or BGIG?

On 1-year performance, JVAL leads with 34.83% vs 22.35% for BGIG. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BGIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JVAL or BGIG?

Over the 1-year period, JVAL has performed better with a 34.83% return vs 22.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JVAL or BGIG?

JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BGIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JVAL or BGIG?

BGIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.63% for JVAL.

What is the main difference between JVAL and BGIG?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.45% for BGIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.