PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUSA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JUSA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JUSA having a 10.58% return and ^GSPC slightly higher at 10.66%.


JUSA

1D
0.55%
1M
2.21%
6M
8.85%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.42%
1M
1.94%
6M
8.74%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
13.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUSA vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JUSA
JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
10.58%22.30%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.66%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JUSA and ^GSPC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.99

The correlation between JUSA and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUSA vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUSA
JUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUSA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JUSA^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.28

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

9.88

+0.23

JUSA vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUSA and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JUSA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUSA drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUSA and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSA^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-56.78%

+42.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-9.10%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.45%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-10.71%

+9.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.09%

-0.04%

Volatility

JUSA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSA^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.25%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

9.96%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

12.52%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

17.00%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

18.05%

+0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, JUSA and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to JUSA (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUSA dropped -14.02% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

JUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUSA and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer