JUNW vs. UXJL
JUNW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUNW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
JUNW vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUNW achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
JUNW
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUNW vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JUNW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF | 3.15% | 4.25% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUNW and UXJL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUNW vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
JUNW
UXJL
JUNW vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF (JUNW) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUNW | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.78 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.35 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUNW | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 1.87 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
JUNW vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUNW drawdown since its inception was -8.57%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNW and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUNW | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -10.29% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.76% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -1.51% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | — | — |
Volatility
JUNW vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUNW | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 13.90% | -10.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 13.90% | -7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 13.90% | -7.49% |
JUNW vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUNW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUNW vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither JUNW nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JUNW and UXJL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JUNW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JUNW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
JUNW and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JUNW and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for JUNW and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer