JUNW vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JUNW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF) and MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JUNW is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. JUNW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

JUNW vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF (JUNW) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNW achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 17.58% return.

JUNW

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 3.90%
• 1Y: 9.91%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNW vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JUNW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF	3.15%	0.54%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNW and MLPI is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

JUNW vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNW

JUNW Risk / Return Rank: 89
JUNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
JUNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
JUNW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
JUNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
JUNW Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNW vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF (JUNW) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUNW	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUNW	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.72	3.49	-1.76

Drawdowns

JUNW vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNW drawdown since its inception was -8.57%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNW and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNW	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.57%	-5.38%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-3.84%	+3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-1.27%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JUNW	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	13.05%	-9.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.41%	13.05%	-6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.41%	13.05%	-6.64%

JUNW vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUNW vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

JUNW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%.

Position	TTM
JUNW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF	0.00%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUNW and MLPI in my portfolio?

JUNW and MLPI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JUNW or MLPI?

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUNW or MLPI?

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for JUNW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUNW or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 0.00% for JUNW.

What is the main difference between JUNW and MLPI?

JUNW is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MLPI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JUNW and 0.68% for MLPI.