JUNT vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JUNT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JUNT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). JUNT is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, JUNT returned 10.64% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. JUNT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

JUNT vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNT achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

JUNT

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: 3.43%
• YTD: 4.22%
• 1Y: 10.64%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNT vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JUNT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF	4.22%	12.42%	10.29%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNT and SBIT is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.41

Return for Risk

JUNT vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNT

JUNT Risk / Return Rank: 71
JUNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JUNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JUNT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
JUNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
JUNT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNT vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JUNT	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.41	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.05	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	2.60	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	5.92	+7.08

JUNT vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNT and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JUNT vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNT drawdown since its inception was -12.78%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNT and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNT	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.78%	-91.35%	+78.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.08%	-47.94%	+43.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-77.15%	+76.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-68.83%	+67.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	21.04%	-20.22%

Volatility

JUNT vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) is 2.83%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that JUNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JUNT	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	22.98%	-20.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.45%	68.89%	-63.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.46%	88.51%	-82.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.28%	96.89%	-87.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	96.89%	-87.61%

JUNT vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUNT vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

JUNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
JUNT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUNT and SBIT in my portfolio?

JUNT and SBIT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JUNT or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to JUNT (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNT dropped -12.78% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, JUNT or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 10.64% for JUNT. On fees, JUNT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, JUNT has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JUNT or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUNT or SBIT?

JUNT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUNT or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for JUNT.

What is the main difference between JUNT and SBIT?

JUNT is categorized as Options Trading, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JUNT and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JUNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.