PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUNT vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUNT vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNT achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 12.25% return.


JUNT

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.54%
YTD
4.25%
6M
5.06%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
10Y*

IWMY

1D
-1.36%
1M
3.06%
YTD
12.25%
6M
10.99%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNT vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JUNT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF
4.25%12.42%16.03%10.10%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
12.25%10.18%5.56%9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNT and IWMY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.70

The correlation between JUNT and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUNT vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNT
JUNT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JUNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUNT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JUNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUNT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNT vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUNTIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.26

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.03

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.87

6.66

+13.22

JUNT vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUNT Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUNT and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUNTIWMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.49

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.95

+0.63

Drawdowns

JUNT vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNT drawdown since its inception was -12.78%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNT and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUNTIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.78%

-18.72%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-11.57%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.36%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-2.98%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

3.51%

-2.80%

Volatility

JUNT vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF (JUNT) is 0.55%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that JUNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUNTIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

5.42%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.37%

12.62%

-8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

15.69%

-9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

15.75%

-6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

15.75%

-6.51%

JUNT vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JUNT vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

JUNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.96%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
45.96%63.33%107.92%11.34%
JUNT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jun ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JUNT and IWMY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to JUNT (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUNT dropped -12.78% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.33% vs 13.99% for JUNT. On fees, JUNT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, JUNT has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.33% return vs 13.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUNT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 0.00% for JUNT.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for JUNT and 0.99% for IWMY.

JUNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUNT and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer