PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEBP vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEBP vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEBP vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


FEBP

1D
1.86%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
-1.82%
6M
1.02%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEBP vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FEBP vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBP
FEBP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FEBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBP Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBP vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEBPOCTQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.14

FEBP vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEBPOCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

Dividends

FEBP vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEBP nor OCTQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FEBP vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBP drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBP and OCTQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEBPOCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

0.00%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

0.00%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

Volatility

FEBP vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEBPOCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

0.00%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.16%

0.00%

+9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.16%

0.00%

+9.16%