JUNP vs. APRB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JUNP (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUNP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.

Performance

JUNP vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June (JUNP) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUNP achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than APRB's 4.77% return.

JUNP

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 3.86%
• 6M: 4.77%
• 1Y: 12.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRB

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 4.77%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUNP vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JUNP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June	3.86%	2.59%
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF	4.77%	2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JUNP and APRB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

JUNP vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUNP

JUNP Risk / Return Rank: 81
JUNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
JUNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
JUNP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
JUNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
JUNP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUNP vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June (JUNP) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JUNP	APRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.68	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JUNP	APRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	2.00	-0.64

Drawdowns

JUNP vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUNP drawdown since its inception was -11.23%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUNP and APRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JUNP	APRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.23%	-4.59%	-6.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.11%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-0.74%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JUNP	APRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.44%	5.98%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.38%	5.98%	+3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.38%	5.98%	+3.40%

JUNP vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUNP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JUNP vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither JUNP nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JUNP and APRB in my portfolio?

JUNP and APRB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JUNP or APRB?

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JUNP or APRB?

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JUNP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JUNP or APRB?

JUNP and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JUNP and APRB?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JUNP and 0.25% for APRB.